Yellow Ribbon Tree Experts

1608

One of our pine trees, the one closest to our shed out back, was struck by lightning not too long ago. We didn’t notice immediately, but the strike killed the tree. We *did* start noticing when hunks of bark began sloughing off…

In looking at the tree we noticed gaping holes in it which indicated that all was not well. We also noticed similar holes in the nearby trees. All of these trees are pretty big. If any of them fell they could land on our house or that of our nearest neighbor.

So we decided to contact a tree cutting service. There are very few people I know of who has had a good experience with one of these outfits. They seem to either damage the property or they don’t haul away the debris or a myriad of other issues.

A friend put us in touch with “Yellow Ribbon Tree Experts”. Gary – the company owner – came by and we immediately liked him. He was able to answer all of our questions and quoted us what I felt to be a fair price.

I’d earlier been approached by a fellow who “was in the neighborhood and can give me a deal while he’s working on a nearby yard”. His price was somewhat lower than Gary’s but I wasn’t really able to nail him down on all the details so I decided to pass on him.

We had contacted two other tree companies, also recommended by friends. One had a child’s voice on their answering machine which was not very encouraging. It didn’t really matter since they never returned our call. The other, the woman who does the estimates was one of the illest sounding people we’d ever encountered. I don’t know what she’s really like, but she sounded really bad each time we spoke with her on the phone. And apparently her life is in a shambles (sick, problems, etc.) which she thought we’d like to know about. Hmmmmm… so we passed on them as well.

Here are some pictures showing the progression of the trees disappearing from the back yard:

1611

It took them the better part of the day, they had to carefully pull down the tree nearest the shed. They did it with no damage to the shed at all! They *did* end up crushing one of our neighbors’ bushes when one of the pieces coming down had an unfortunate bounce and roll. Gary went next door to work out replacing the bush.Once they were gone, there was only a pile of wood shavings where the stumps used to be (which we have since used to cover our pathways – saving us having to pick up any pine bark nuggets this year..).

1613

Overall everything went well, there were some scratches on the post at the corner of the patio and on our garbage box from the trees dragging past those but these were easily dealt with using some spare paint.

1615
1617

I Fired Comcast

The saga continues. After that really sorry dealing with the phone customer service rep (phone CSR) on the phone on Sunday evening after my modem stopped working, I decided it might actually be faster to just go down to a Comcast store and swap out the modem.

Despite the assurances of phone CSR with whom I was dealing, the last time I went to the Comcast store they informed me that they did not do modem swaps as they did not keep any in stock. At that time, however, there had been a Comcast service van in the parking lot so teller CSR went out and just grabbed one from the truck. Swap done, all was well.

I had prophylactically set up an appointment for Thursday (August 23) for between 8 and 10 am in case I wasn’t going to get to the store and/or in case there was something else wrong beyond the modem. Interestingly, when I asked for the confirmation number phone CSR said there wasn’t any but that I should call back if I needed to check and they could find it through my account.

On Monday I trundled over to the Alpharetta Comcast store, which is near to wear I work (well.. a 15 minute drive) and found a) they had moved to a new location and b) they are closed Monday – a fact that phone CSR had failed to mention when he gave me the location but which the relocation sign fortunately stated.

On Tuesday I headed back out to find the store – a block away from the old location – and combined that trip with a LATE lunch, arriving at ten after two in the afternoon. They were closed for a “special” lunch from two ’til three that day. Another bust.

I elected to leave early from work on Tuesday, intending to get to that Comcast shop, get my modem swapped out, get home and then do a little work from home to make up for all that wasted time trying to conform to Comcasts’ 1950’s approach to customer service.

Arriving at the shop I was gleeful that it was actually open. Entering the shop showed only 5 people ahead of me.. not too bad it seemed. My glee was short-lived, however, when I realized that they had only one person working there and the guy in line ahead of me expressed his displeasure at how slowly things were moving. Over half an hour later I got to the front of the queue. I kid you not, there were over a dozen people now behind me. This CSR looked at my modem, went into the back room and brought out an identical one and tried to swap it for me, but the computer would not let her. Then she went back and got yet another identical one (after mentioning that she wasn’t sure if they had any more) which the computer *did* allow her to give to me. I’m not 100% sure but I’m pretty sure she just dropped my returned modem into the same bin from which she fished out these replacements.

I mentioned that I had an appointment on Thursday that she could now cancel and she suggested that I keep the appointment in case this modem doesn’t work. Hmmm… wonder why she said that. I got home with the replacement modem, hooked it up and, surprise! It exhibited the same symptoms as my last modem.

I can’t say I was pleased but since I had that Thursday appointment and since this modem having the EXACT SAME PROBLEM seemed a little coincidental, I elected to wait for the appointment. I was having to stay at home on Thursday anyway as we were having some tree cutters come by to clear some dead and dying pines from my back yard.

As you can imagine, Wednesday was a looong day as I caught up on a backlog of work from the foibles the previous day. When I got home I realized that I had not received a confirmation call from Comcast regarding the next day’s appointment. My home number is set to roll over to my cell whenever the Vonage router is not reachable, so I should definitely have received this. So I called Comcast to confirm the appointment.

Another half an hour on the phone had phone CSR2 telling me that there was no ticket for my Thursday appointment, but he could schedule me for the following Wednesday. I told him that there was no way I was going to wait another week on this. I wanted the tech guy out at my place by tomorrow or they could just go ahead and close this account. I then wanted to speak to his supervisor to get this dealt with. Phone CSR2 told me that he would escalate it – smoothly inferring that he would personally follow my escalation through to completion until I pressed him on how that would work. It turns out that the escalation is dealt with by my local Comcast service group and they’re only open from 8:00 ’til 5:00 (according to phone CSR2). All he does is puts the request into a queue that some other CSR will presumably read the next day and, if there is a cancellation, I might get lucky.

So I pressed to speak to his supervisor and, when smooth talkin’ phone CSR2 finally ran out of reasons why it wouldn’t help, he put me on hold as the supervisor was apparently handling another call at the moment. I felt like I was back in a car dealership with phone CSR2 “working for me”. After 5 minutes or so he came back on the line to let me know that the supervisor was still on the phone and how there is nothing more he could do anyway. I said I’d wait. 5 or more minutes go by again and smooth talkin’ phone CSR2 was back with the same spiel. I told him he’d won I didn’t want to spend any more time on the phone but I wanted him to add the phrase “Customer will cancel account if service tech is not at house by noon Thursday”. This he translated to “Customer is unhappy” and I can’t say if even that got onto the ticket.

Calling back at 8:00’ish the next day I get phone CSR3 who wants to troubleshoot the modem (“Please open internet explorer”) even though I clearly tell him that I want to ensure that my ticket is being escalated. He assures me that he will personally follow this ticket but that the Marietta service location doesn’t open until 8:30. I made it very clear to him that either they get out to my place by noon or I would be calling back to close this account. I made him aware of the failure of phone CSR(1) to create my appointment and how I do use and rely heavily upon my broadband connectivity. After noting that I already had an appointment for next Wednesday, he assured me that he’d follow up and call when an appointment was set.

Two pm rolls around and I hear nothing from Comcast. I’m really ticked. I make arrangements with BellSouth to get their 6 Mbps / 3 Mbps service and then call Comcast to cancel. I’m asked how I want to return the modem, I tell them I’ll leave it on the front porch and they can pick it up. They say they can’t do that. The tech *has* to deal with a live person to hand them a receipt. And they can only do this between 8 am and 5 pm. I relent and get the location of the Comcast store nearest to me. I grab the modem and immediately head out the door so that I can get Comcast out of my world as fast as possible. I had been intending to work from home on Thursday and take Friday off. Comcast’s absolute failure to service me ruined that day and I needed to work on Friday to make up for that.

I do *not* like Comcast’s smooth talking CSRs. They will do ANYTHING to avoid letting you get past them to somebody who might be able to solve your issue. They are among the most slick, yet least capable CSRs I have ever dealt with. And, as a computer guy who deals with a bunch of product help desks, I’ve seen plenty. I was outright lied to by phone CSR(1) when he claimed to have set up my appointment. They have a cavalier disregard for the impact their service disruptions have on their clients and seem trained primarily in the art of soothing rather than empowered to actually take a problem and resolve it.

And I emphasize again (see my last posting, typed while on the phone with phone CSR(1)), what kind of a business *is* Comcast when their stores and their residential service techs (in Marietta at the very least) are only available during normal business hours? What community are they serving where folks can afford to take time off to sit at home waiting for them – everybody *I* know works for a living – ESPECIALLY if the service impacted is broadband access – which is the reason some folks may be able to stay at home?

I had my doubts about Comcast when I first moved to them from BellSouth nearly two years ago. My previous dealings with them were somewhat unsavory and I fired them back then and switched to satellite TV after my cable rates were raised without any notification. When I called then to ask what was going on, they mailed me a pamphlet explaining the rate increases.

They make a *lot* of money off of broadband service. My understanding is that, in places like Korea, they have vastly superior broadband access (10+ Mbps down and something similar up) for the the equivalent of US$35. So there really is no excuse for they sloppy and uninspired service that Comcast provides.

Dark Chocolate lovers, are they Masochists?

I’ll say it here and now, I love chocolate. Not just some casual affair or a one night stand, my love of chocolate is the stuff of legend.

Now, when I say chocolate, I am thinking of what is more commonly known as milk chocolate. I have sampled many different varieties of dark chocolate. And I’ve even sampled a number of “white chocolate” offerings.

Right now, and without any further debate, I am discarding white chocolate from consideration. It’s just a phantom of the chocolate experience. It is made without the essence of chocolate (i.e. the cocoa beans) and is more just sweet than chocolate.

Dark chocolate (also called semi-sweet) is everthing about the chocolate experience except for the enjoyment. The only way to appreciate dark chocolate is to pair it with something that it can reflect off of such as almonds. I believe dark chocolate is enjoyed, on its own, by people too uptight to enjoy the true hedonistic experience that is milk chocolate and they feel they must dull down the experience or at least make sure they cannot enjoy it fully by stimulating the bitter part of the palate while leaving the sweet portion thereof wonting.
I imagine, in the minds of alleged dark chocolate afficionados, the same process is going on as in the minds of cloistered monks who, in trying to atone for their sins (aka existing) self-flagellate so they can go on living, but since they are not really enjoying it, they are somehow exhibiting the righteousness necessary to eventually pass into their heaven.

There is almost no purer pleasure on this green earth than that of the taste of a wonderful milk chocolate morsel when it first makes its presence known to your taste buds. It is a rapturous experience to be enjoyed without moderation or guilt. It is the greatest favor that you can do for yourself.

Labels in clothing

Ever since mass produced clothing has been around and there has been a middle-class of folks that need to do their own laundry, there have been labels in clothes that are supposed to offer information that should be valuable for as long as you own your clothes. These labels usually consist of a piece of material sewn into the collar or waistband of the clothing.

In the past (post industrial revolution, pre-twenty-first century), these were necessary evils that allowed folks to know care and handling instructions for garments. And, as middle age encroaches, sizes seem to be more and more important as you migrate to different sizes of pants and underclothes over time…
Not to mention that on groggier mornings, having a guide as to which way the garment should be worn can be handy.

However, how many people have purchased a garment that had not one, not two but three or more tags. Offering no more information than the single tag but, presumably, there was some advantage in the manufacturing process if the information can be spread out over multiple tags.

Otherwise flawless garments are disfigured with the outline of the tags bulging at the back, or worse, who hasn’t seen an attractive woman, dressed to kill, with the clothing tag sticking up against the nape of her neck prising the image of sophistication away from her and ensuring that she remains in the realm of the rest of us mere mortals.
When I kiss my wife goodbye in the morning it’s almost reflex for me to reach around behind her neck and tuck the labels from at least one of the minimum of 3 layers of clothing she’s wearing back down inside the garments.

For guys, since it really isn’t as important how we look, the biggest irritant of clothing tags is that they’re, well… irritating. I have a pair of Nike running shorts (yeah, yeah I know, buying into crass consumerism – YOU find a decent pair of running shorts in under 15 minutes) that has labels sewn into both sides of the waistband at the back. Ironically, the inner tags are of no consequence, but the outer one, being made of a durable fabric and sewn such that even the four horsemen of the apocalypse would be stymied in trying to remove it, chafes when I run. I actually need to hike my underwear up in the back or tuck my shirt into my shorts – neither of which are images you want to hold in your mind for very long – in order to run comfortably.

I remember actually ruining a shirt by trying to cut out a tag that was integrally sewn into the seam at the back of the neck. I got a little too close to that damned seam and split it.

Recently Mich bought me some undershirts that have all that tag information printed on the inside back. Omigod! So the technology is there now where we don’t need to have those miserable labels at all. Their function, important as it is, can be done without being irritating or detracting from the garment purpose.

This technology may have been around for decades and I’m just noticing it now. I don’t have a great interest in my clothes except that they be comfortable and not too worn to be used in public places (for Mich’s edification at least).

Starting with my underclothes, I’m now emphasizing No Tags! Fruit of the Loom’s undershirts are a first step. All other things being equal, if their underpants are available in a label-less format (your guess whether they’d be boxers or briefs) then they get my patronage too.

Is this where my FEMA tax dollars are going?

I just received this in the mail and I can’t decide if it’s some insurance companies pretending to be represented by FEMA or if FEMA is shilling for the insurance companies. I didn’t really think it was the job of our esteemed government agencies to arbitrarily recommend insurance companies to us.

Regulate, maybe. Rate, perhaps. But, in spite of the disclaimer (last image below), this seems like outright endorsement to me.

What do you think?

1309
Envelope from FEMA

1311
First part of message on over-long paper

1313
Second part of message with David Maurstad’s signature on it

Advertisements in Podcasts

As podcasting begins to mature, it is only natural that some folks will work to profit from it. I think, for the near future, the vast majority of podcasts will remain free. But for those that move into the commercial realm, they face the daunting task of finding a monetization model that will be acceptable to users who have absolute control over their listening (and viewing, for videocasts) devices.

Some profit models will simply be that you need to pay to subscribe and be done with it. This is challenging as, with so much content available out there for free, there will have to be very compelling content for folks to pay for it up front like that.

The most probable model will fall back to advertising. The targetted demographics of podcasting are astounding. An audience that has actually made the effort go seek out particular content, download it and then listen to it. TV of old with its “elephant gun” approach to advertising (we have x million folks watching our (one of three competing) station, they’re loosely in this demographic so hopefully we can convince advertisers to sell stuff with us), was somewhat successful and it was the best model available for a long time.

I was watching “Star Trek” (the ancient series) on G4 a couple of nights ago and was pretty amazed how tightly focused the advertising was.

But the thing I have been finding with the podcast advertising is that they haven’t clued in yet that the advertisements need to be as entertaining as the content. Listening to a daily show with the exact same ad every day will have you skipping the ad in no time flat. As with radio and TV, especially with TIVO, if the ads are not engaging they will not be viewed. Even if folks do not outright skip the ads with a flip of the finger – there is legislative and technological bumbling to try to prevent such making its way through their courses now – in this era of “continuous limited attention” folks will simply tune out the drivel and focus on their laptop, their blackberry, that other channel, that magazine in front of them. In short, you can no longer force folks to pay attention to content that they don’t wish to.

With more entertainment and diversions available to us than ever before in the history of this planet, people are not going to waste their time with what does not appeal to them.

Longevity and the Human Condition

I’m having a back-and-forth with one of my friends and thought I’d share some pieces of it for perusal and maybe some discussion.

One Hand: I’ve read from several sources that with a healthy lifestyle, it is actually natural and normal for human beings to reach the age of 120 (the people of Okanawa are a good example). But how practical would that be on a large scale? As long as the western world is polluting the air, water and food, eating processed food, not exercising, creating stress in the pursuit of status and material gain etc. the extension of human life will only be achievable artificially and where is the quality of life in that? What would be the point? Can people even afford to live to 100 and beyond? What would it do to our economy? I don’t know what the current situation is in the US, but the Canadian medical establishment is on the verge of collapse because the cost of medical care is so extravagently expensive. Add to that a large population of centenarians needing replacement body parts, organs etc., how is it possible to sustain? Certainly an interesting subject to ponder.

The Other Hand: I have to disagree that the artificiality you cite as being necessary to the extension of human life would be a bad thing. How natural are antibiotics? Or living inside of heated dwellings with clean running water?

I read an interesting article about a year or so ago where a fellow with “Doctors without Borders” was working with folks in very remote locations where “modern” life had not yet encroached. Very contrary to his expectations he found that valium was a popular drug being dispensed there. It seems that stress and anxiety was a normal part of life out there, at rates very comparable to what we first-worlders experience. The only difference being the foci of the problems.
I think we can all relate, look at how worked up children get over simple things. They have no taxes, no job obligations, yet their concerns and worries are as real to them as ours are to us. I would put it to you that folks are either anxious or they are not. It is part of the human condition and very likely always will be.

I agree with the considerations that you raise about increased longevity. But don’t forget we’ve already dealt with many of these issues before as the average lifespan has been steadily increasing decade by decade. It’s now just a question of degree. Other cultural shifts have just as much potential for messing up actuarial tables. One that comes to mind immediately are partners in lesbian couples that can now benefit from each other’s pension and health schemes. I see many rate-setters scrambling to come up with revisions to such plans to keep them viable in the light of such new reality.

I recall that, in the 70s, there were dire warnings that the planet would never be able to support X billion people and we’d all starve in the early 2000’s if not sooner. Technology has a brilliant way of putting the lie to such doomsaying and I suspect that is a trend that will only continue.

I have a fixed confidence that both human civilization and the biosphere are much more incredibly robust than we allow ourselves to conceive. There will always be tragedy and problems on a small scale, but the larger context will end up accommodating and even booning from the break with old patterns.

Bank of America – What’s not to trust?

I have a “Financial Rewards” VISA card through Bank of America (BofA). I have it through them since, at the time, they were the only ones who seemed to be offering such.

In past dealings with BofA, I’ve been put off by what I interpret to be “Nickel and diming” behavior. They seem to have service fees for everything, monthly service fees for your checking account, check writing fees, you name it.

I found it amusing when I received this “Cardholder Thank You” item mixed in with the bits and pieces that accompany my monthly VISA bill.
1287

What was humorous to me was that this advert, in the form of a fake check, and with BofA’s logo displayed prominently at the top, had this to say in its fine print (you’ll need to click to read it):
1289

So, Bank of America is telling me that, even though they are sending me this advertisement in an envelope that is coming from them, with their letterhead on it, as a “Thank You” for being a possesor of their VISA card, that I can take advantage of by including the order form (on the reverse of the fake check) with my VISA payment, they have nothing to do with this offer?

I’m not sure I’m really impressed with a company using its brand to shill for “Gift Services, Inc.” and yet will neither stand by the quality nor service associated with the products.

I… think I’m going to get a new credit card from a company that I would prefer to be associated with. These “cash back” credit cards are becoming much more popular now, and no blackout dates 🙂

**Update June 30, 2006** I tried to find Gift Services, Inc. using Google. I found one company by that name based in Denver, Colorado, but the “Cardholder Thank You” document indicates that this company is using a P.O. Box in Utah. Same outfit? Perhaps.